Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Amendment 58 -- Severance Taxes on the Oil and Natural Gas Industry

This would 1) eliminate a state tax credit thereby increasing the severance tax paid by companies that extract oil and natural gas, 2) increase the number of wells subject to the severance tax, 3) tax companies earning $300,000 a year at 5% but eliminate severance tax for companies earning less than $300,000, 4) not constrain future severance tax revenue to the TABOR collection or spending limitations, 5) allocate future severance tax revenue as follows: 22% state, 22% local, and 56% Stabilization Trust Fund (60% college Colorado Promise scholarships, 15% for wildlife habitat, 10% for energy efficiency and clean energy, 10% for transportation, 5% for drinking water and wastewater with a set-aside for a reserve account ). A portion of the Stabilization Trust Fund would consist of a reserve account presumably with the transfers eventually going to the recipients outlined above. The expected increase in collections is estimated to provide the existing revenue recipients (50% state programs and 50% local governments) with approximately the same revenue over the next 4 years.

STATUTORY Change

Amendment 52 and Amendment 58 have conflicting provisions on the allocation of severance tax revenue. If voters approve both amendments, Amendment 52 would presumably take precedence since it is a constitutional amendment.

Recommendation: yes
This amendment is an attempt to find more revenue for our state which has been squeezed financially since the economic downturn at the beginning of this decade. I would prefer that a large portion of the severance tax go to the general fund instead of more than half going to earmarks. The Blue Book draft analysis noted that Colorado has the lowest actual severance tax rate of the eight western states that are large oil and natural gas producers when exemptions, deductions, and credits are taken into account. This measure would raise the ranking to the third lowest.


Website for Yes side (A Smarter Colorado)
http://www.asmartercolorado.org/

Website for No side (Coloradans for a Stable Economy)
http://www.voteno58.com/


Amendment 58 (Approved ballot title below)

Severance Taxes on the Oil and Natural Gas Industry

SHALL STATE TAXES BE INCREASED $321.4 MILLION ANNUALLY BY AN AMENDMENT TO THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES CONCERNING THE SEVERANCE TAX ON OIL AND GAS EXTRACTED IN THE STATE, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, FOR TAXABLE YEARS COMMENCING ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2009, CHANGING THE TAX TO 5% OF TOTAL GROSS INCOME FROM THE SALE OF OIL AND GAS EXTRACTED IN THE STATE WHEN THE AMOUNT OF ANNUAL GROSS INCOME IS AT LEAST $300,000; ELIMINATING A CREDIT AGAINST THE SEVERANCE TAX FOR PROPERTY TAXES PAID BY OIL AND GAS PRODUCERS AND INTEREST OWNERS; REDUCING THE LEVEL OF PRODUCTION THAT QUALIFIES WELLS FOR AN EXEMPTION FROM THE TAX; EXEMPTING REVENUES FROM THE TAX AND RELATED INVESTMENT INCOME FROM STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING LIMITS; AND REQUIRING THE TAX REVENUES TO BE CREDITED AS FOLLOWS: (A) 22% TO THE SEVERANCE TAX TRUST FUND, (B) 22% TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SEVERANCE TAX FUND, AND (C) 56% TO A NEW SEVERANCE TAX STABILIZATION TRUST FUND, OF WHICH 60% IS USED TO FUND SCHOLARSHIPS FOR COLORADO RESIDENTS ATTENDING STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, 15% TO FUND THE PRESERVATION OF NATIVE WILDLIFE HABITAT, 10% TO FUND RENEWABLE ENERGY AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAMS, 10% TO FUND TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS IN COUNTIES AND MUNICIPALITIES IMPACTED BY THE SEVERANCE OF OIL AND GAS, AND 5% TO FUND COMMUNITY DRINKING WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENT GRANTS?

Yes ________________ No ________________


To see the full text of the proposed measure, click here, then click on “2008 State Ballot Information Booklet” at the top of the page.

2 comments:

  1. This seems like an easy one to me. If we remain a state with one of the lowest severance taxes even after the increase, there's not much risk the Gas and Oil folks will fold up their pumpjacks and leave as a result of this passing.
    I'll be voting yes, too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You have probably heard that in Iraq one of the areas of contention is an equitable distribution of oil revenue. The Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds all feel that they should benefit from the natural resource that is under their soil. Whenever I hear about this dispute I think, "The citizens of Colorado should also benefit from the oil and gas natural resource in Colorado." Amendment 58 will allow Coloradans to receive a larger share of the value of this natural resource that oil companies take from under our soil and sell on the world-wide market. The amendment ends a subsidy that oil and gas corporations currently receive. At this moment in our history the oil and gas industry is the last group that should be getting a subsidy.


    Here’s why you should support Amendment 58:

    We should help Colorado's poor but qualified high school graduates get a college education. Amendment 58 will provide need-based scholarships to hard-working students. We get one of our highest rates of return by investing in our own human capital.

    Colorado can lead the way for a new energy economy, one that utilizes renewable energy resources instead of draining our limited supply of oil and gas. Amendment 58 will advance Colorado renewable energy projects.

    Areas that allow oil and gas companies to drill on their lands should still have safe drinking water. Amendment 58 will provide a safety net for communities impacted by oil and gas drilling.


    Citizens of Wyoming receive more than twice the benefit, per barrel or thousand cubic feet, from its oil and gas resource than citizens of Colorado. Wyoming uses this money to pay for college for every high school graduate with good grades who wants to go to college.

    The opposition is running ads that imply that this measure will raise the costs of ordinary Coloradans. This isn't true. It will make oil companies pay a fairer share, but this will have practically no effect on oil costs for Coloradans since oil prices are dependent on world-wide supply and demand. It will not raise any tax that ordinary citizens of Colorado pay.


    The oil companies are attacking Governor Ritter for supporting this measure. Governor Ritter has staked a lot of his political capital by championing Amendment 58, and we should support him because he is fighting for us.

    The oil companies are making record profits, and they are using some of that money to run misleading ads. This is a classic confrontation between two types of political power-- money and people. The oil companies will probably spend more money combating this initiative than has ever been spent on a ballot measure before, but they do not deserve to win. They should not be able to buy an election result that benefits only them.

    Ken Gordon
    Majority Leader
    Colorado Senate

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for your comments. Please only make comments that add to a fruitful discussion.